Showing posts with label are. Show all posts
Showing posts with label are. Show all posts
Saturday, November 26, 2016
L A Lakers are ready for new Sessions
L A Lakers are ready for new Sessions

The Los Angeles Lakers got an infusion of new blood to help in their post-season aspirations, acquiring Ramon Sessions, Christian Eyenga and Jordan Hill in two separate deals, part of the eight swaps that occurred in the NBA prior to the leagues trade deadline.
Looking to upgrade their point guard position, LA acquired Sessions and Eyenga, along with the rights to exchange their 2013 first-round draft pick with the Miami Heat, in a trade with the Cleveland Cavaliers, giving up Luke Walton, Jason Kapono, and the Lakers 2012 first-round pick.
The Lakers also parted ways with long-time veteran Derek Fisher, sending him to the Houston Rockets along with another first-round pick for big man Jordan Hill.
The Rockets also figured in another deal, exchanging fringe players Hasheem Thabeet and Jonny Flynn, plus a 2012 second-round draft pick, for center Marcus Camby, from the Portland Trail Blazers.
It was just part of Portlands demolition job, which saw the failing franchise jettison veteran players and fire their head coach, Nate McMillan. Prior to the Rockets deal, the Trail Blazers also sent forward Gerald Wallace to the New Jersey Nets, getting in return center Mehmet Okur, forward Shawne Williams, and a top-three protected first round pick.
Portland is expected to work on a buyout with Williams, and waived former overall number one draft pick Greg Oden and Chris Johnson.
The Golden State Warriors, a team that participated in a five-player deal two days before the deadline with the Milwaukee Bucks, turned around and dealt one of the players they had just acquired, sending Stephen Jackson to the San Antonio Spurs, in exchange for a conditional first-round pick in the upcoming draft, the contract of retiring guard TJ Ford, and forward Richard Jefferson.
Jackson actually spent several seasons with the Spurs in the past, helping them reach an NBA championship in the 2002-2003 season.
The last trade to make the deadline was a three-team transaction among the Washington Wizards, the Los Angeles Clippers and the Denver Nuggets. The Wizards sent guard Nick Young to the Clippers and big men JaVale McGee and Ronny Turiaf to the Nuggets. In exchange, the Nuggets sent them Brazilian center Nene, while the Clippers gave back forward Brian Cook and a future second-round pick.
Two minor deals also went down early, with the Memphis Grizzlies giving up Sam Young to the Philadelphia 76ers for a prospect, and the Indiana Pacers picking up Leandro Barbosa from the Toronto Raptors for a second-round choice.
Fans hopes for a blockbuster deal were dashed early on when Orlando Magic center Dwight Howard waived his early termination option, ensuring that he would spend at least one more year with his team.
Howards actions meant that he would not enter free agency this off-season, which would have made the Magic consider trading him early, rather than letting him walk without getting anything back.
Other names that did not see movement include the Lakers Pau Gasol, Minnesotas Michael Beasley, the Portland backcourt of Raymond Felton and Jamal Crawford, and Rajon Rondo of the Boston Celtics.
For more: Visit NBA Trade Tracker now.
We welcome healthy discussions and friendly debate!
We welcome healthy discussions and friendly debate!
Available link for download
Thursday, October 27, 2016
Just How Good Are Those Knock Offs
Just How Good Are Those Knock Offs
-By Dan dos Santos
China is a manufacturing super power. They can produce just about anything in massive quantities, and at a cost few other countries can compete with. As a result, the country is ripe with opportunities to manufacture anything thats desirable at the moment. This happens to include illegal things as well, like replicas of brand name items such as iPhones or designer handbags. This is often referred to as the Grey Market.
Its worth noting that these knockoffs are often produced by the exact same manufacturer (and likely often times the exact same individuals), meaning little difference in quality or material. Thats not always the case, of course. Obviously cost plays a role in quality, meaning there are good knock offs and bad knock offs... but I have seen some surprisingly good knock offs before.
Ive always been curious to know if this extends to their imitation paintings as well.

Im sure that you have all seen websites where you can buy REAL oil paintings of famous images for just a few dollars. In fact, Ive seen websites where I could buy illegal replicas of MY OWN artwork more times than I can count.
At first, you take insult to it. But after its happened enough times, you really just dont care anymore. Theres not enough money being made, or lost, to make it worth my time to bother with it. Trust me, no one is getting rich making copies of my work.
But it made me wonder.... Just how good are these copies?
Can these guys paint better than me?
If they were really good, or even just pretty good, could I have them replicate my digital preliminaries, into real underpaintings that I could then later finish?
Could I have them turn my digital paintings into real oil paintings for me?
Could I outsource my art?!
I came to the conclusion that I dont want to do ANY of those things, even if I could. But I was still curious about the quality of these paintings.
So... In the spirit of professional curiosity, I took it upon myself to buy one.

I didnt want to use my own art for this experiment. So I decided to buy a replica of a classical painting, from someone who is dead. In this case, I chose this incredible painting by the Hungarian artist Maria Szantho (1897-1997).
The description was VERY specific about this being a real oil painting, crafted 100% by Hand. But I figured it was quite likely that these might be digital giclees with just a little oil embellishment. So
just in case, I decided to contact the seller anyways, and make sure of it. He assured me they were indeed real paintings.

I went ahead and purchased it. The painting arrived rolled in a tube about 20 days later.
As I began to unroll it, the first thing I noticed was that the painting wasnt painted on normal cotton canvas. It is painted on some sort of synthetic canvas, likely a polyester or vinyl. It is extremely shiny and grey in color.
Cotton canvas at top, synthetic canvas at bottom. |
The paintings surface was covered in a thin plastic wrap, which I easily peeled away. As I did, I was immediately overwhelmed by the noxious smell of the painting. And mind you, I literally sit a turpentine riddled studio all day. This smell was intense. I actually had to bring it out into the garage. I suspect the artists are using some pretty strong solvents to make sure these oil paints dry in time for shipping. Likely a commercial grade paint stripper.
I also suspect they are not using the same type of artist grade oil paints we would use. The paint itself smells more like sign painting oils. If any of our readers are familiar with quick drying oil enamels like 1-shot, it smells very much like that.
As for the actual painting... To be honest, my first impression of the painting really wasnt that bad. Perhaps a non-artist might not notice the differences? But I was looking for those subtle passages that made the original so beautiful to me, like the fingers, the toes, and the way the face falls into warm shadow. Sadly, those were the exact areas where the painting really fell flat. In general, the form of the figure really lacked the sense of light and shadow that the original possesses. It also seems to be lacking the intense highlights that brought a sense of texture to the skin. All of the flesh seems to be rendered rather monochromatically.
Youll also note in the photos above this bizarre striping in the image. This is from rippling in the canvas. The material is so reflective however, that it causes an optical illusion of sorts, and makes it look like the surface is dirty. These ripples are appearing more and more as the painting is exposed to air. Its possible that as the oils dry, they are tightening on the surface, and drawing the canvas inward, causing the ripples.
You can definitely tell that whomever painted this image (and it may have been more than one person) had some training, but they really are a novice at best. I overlapped the two paintings, and the drawing seems to be quite accurate, implying a level of skill that the painting execution does not. I would guess that the original image was projected on the canvas to do the drawing.

So overall... I would say that the painting is a reasonable facsimile if what youre looking for is to decorate your bathroom or something and you dont live in a house full of artists.
But as for anything that could be of any professional interest, I think its pretty useless.
Available link for download
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)